UNSPSC 85533363: Dilation of inferior vena cava with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of inferior vena cava with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06703DZ

UNSPSC 85533363 Dilation of inferior vena cava with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not align with state and local procurement activity currently posted in the market. The code describes a specific surgical procedure involving vascular intervention, but the recent state and local contract opportunities tagged to this code reflect health service procurement broadly—medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, occupational health surveillance, and temporary clinical staffing—rather than procurement of the device or procedure itself.

State and local governments are not soliciting acquisition of intraluminal vena cava devices or the technical capability to perform percutaneous dilation procedures under this code in the public record. The opportunities posted show instead administrative and clinical services contracting at the city, county, and regional health system level: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office seeking independent medical evaluation services for disability determinations, the Washington State Department of Transportation (Washington State Ferries) requesting occupational medical surveillance, the County of Santa Clara Health System establishing a qualified vendor pool for temporary ancillary clinical staffing, and several jurisdictions procuring pharmacy benefit management and surgical carve-out programs. No recent opportunity reflects device procurement, surgical procedure contracting, or hospital procedure-line procurement at the UNSPSC Commodity specificity this code nominally describes. The mismatch suggests tagging error rather than active state and local demand under the code's actual scope.