UNSPSC 85533321: Drainage of inferior mesenteric vein with drainage device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of inferior mesenteric vein with drainage device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 069630Z

UNSPSC 85533321, Drainage of inferior mesenteric vein with drainage device, percutaneous approach (Commodity), shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific surgical procedure performed on a single anatomical system and is not aligned with the work actually being solicited under recent opportunities tagged to it.

The recent opportunities posted under this code span medical services and staffing: independent medical evaluations for disability benefit determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office, RFP due October 16, 2026), surgical carve-out benefits and Centers of Excellence networks (City of Long Beach, RFP due October 7, 2026), occupational medical surveillance for ferry system workers (Washington State Department of Transportation, RFP due October 9, 2026), emergency and inpatient hospital services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, RFI due September 25, 2026), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County Board of County Commissioners, RFP due April 9, 2026), and temporary ancillary health professional staffing (County of Santa Clara Health System, RFP due October 7, 2026). These are administrative health services, occupational health programs, benefits procurement, and clinical staffing — none of which involve the specific venous drainage procedure the code nominally describes. The issuing bodies include county governments, cities, state departments, and a county health system; the opportunities span Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida. The code appears to be a taxonomy misalignment rather than an active procurement category for state and local buyers.