UNSPSC 85533182: Occlusion of inferior mesenteric vein, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of inferior mesenteric vein, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06L63ZZ

UNSPSC 85533182 Occlusion of inferior mesenteric vein, percutaneous approach — a Commodity code for a specific vascular intervention procedure — shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The six recent opportunities tagged under this code span independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs for municipal employee health plans, occupational medical surveillance for ferry system workers, specialty and emergency medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, and temporary clinical staffing pools. None of these solicitations involve the vascular occlusion procedure itself or related interventional supplies and equipment.

The code appears to have been applied as a catchall for health services procurement by state and local agencies rather than for the specific medical device or procedural service the code nominates. Issuers include Arizona municipalities (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), California cities (City of Long Beach), Washington state transportation authorities (Washington State Department of Transportation), Texas county juvenile justice departments (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), Florida county governments (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and California health systems (County of Santa Clara Health System). The geographic spread spans Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington. If your firm pursues medical device, interventional supply, or healthcare technology sales to state and local entities, this code's recent activity does not represent your target market — the tagging appears misaligned with the code's scope, and pursuing opportunities under it would require clarification with each issuing body about actual procurement intent.