UNSPSC 85532755: Dilation of superior mesenteric vein, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of superior mesenteric vein, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06750ZZ

UNSPSC 85532755 Dilation of superior mesenteric vein, open approach is a Commodity code whose nominal scope does not align with recent state and local contract activity. The five most recent opportunities posted under this code involve inmate medical and pharmacy services (Muscogee County Prison), pharmacy benefit management for county employees (Collier County), virtual primary and urgent care services (Monroe County), peer support services for mental health workers (San Mateo County), and fire department medical direction (Santa Monica). None of these solicitations involve vascular surgical procedures or medical devices related to superior mesenteric vein dilation. The code shows little relevant recent activity and appears to reflect a cataloging mismatch between the UNSPSC taxonomy and what state and local procurement offices are actually buying under this classification.

The issuing bodies span county commissioners' offices (Collier County in Florida, Monroe County in Florida, Muscogee County in Georgia), a county health department (San Mateo County in California), and a city fire department (Santa Monica, California), indicating fragmentation across geographies and service categories. No repeat issuing bodies appear in the recent opportunities, and the work itself—administrative healthcare services, pharmacy management, virtual care delivery, peer support, and medical direction—bears no operational connection to a surgical code. State and local procurement professionals evaluating this code should recognize that the five posted opportunities are categorically unrelated to the code's stated scope and treat this as a signal that the code is either dormant for surgical procedural work or incorrectly applied to healthcare services contracts in these jurisdictions' sourcing systems.