UNSPSC 85532282: Bypass left femoral vein to lower vein with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass left femoral vein to lower vein with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 061N47Y

UNSPSC 85532282 Bypass left femoral vein to lower vein with autologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the state and local contract opportunities posted under it. The recent solicitations tagged to this code—independent medical evaluation services for disability retirement determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing—address general healthcare administration, benefits program management, and clinical staffing coordination rather than the specific vascular surgical procedure the code nominally describes. State and local procurement offices appear to be using this code as a catch-all classifier for healthcare services procurement broadly, creating a mismatch between the code's technical specification and actual buying activity.

The issuing bodies across these opportunities span county health systems (Santa Clara, Collier, Harris), municipal retirement offices (Phoenix), state transportation agencies (Washington), and city employee benefits programs (Long Beach), reflecting a fragmented buyer base with no clear repeat pattern under this code. Geographic activity includes Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington across the most recent postings. The lack of coherence between the code definition and actual solicitation scope—no recent opportunities for the vascular procedure itself—signals that this code sees minimal aligned procurement activity. Firms evaluating pursuit should verify code classification with each issuing body before committing resources, as tagging appears inconsistent with work scope.