UNSPSC 85532140: Insertion of infusion device into right lesser saphenous vein, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of infusion device into right lesser saphenous vein, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06HR43Z

UNSPSC 85532140 Insertion of infusion device into right lesser saphenous vein, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code with no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific clinical procedure and does not align with the medical services state and local governments actually solicit under current UNSPSC taxonomy usage. Recent opportunities posted under this code—including independent medical evaluation services for public safety pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026), occupational medical surveillance for ferry system employees (Washington State Department of Transportation RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026), surgery benefit carve-out networks for municipal employees (City of Long Beach RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County RFP 25-8414, April 9, 2026 deadline), and temporary health professional staffing (Santa Clara County Health System RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026)—demonstrate systematic miscoding rather than genuine demand for infusion-device insertion procedures. State and local procurement offices appear to use this code as a catch-all for medical services rather than for a narrowly defined surgical intervention.

The geographic spread of recent activity spans Arizona, Washington, California, and Florida, representing state departments, county health systems, county commissioners, and municipal retirement offices. The scale of issuing bodies ranges from large metro areas to regional counties. However, the procedural mismatch between the code's clinical definition and the scope of work actually being solicited signals that this code should be monitored only if your firm specializes in medical staffing, benefits administration, or occupational health contracting—not for device-based interventions. The code itself does not represent a reliable procurement signal for state and local work.