UNSPSC 85532122: Occlusion of left greater saphenous vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of left greater saphenous vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06LQ4DZ

UNSPSC 85532122 Occlusion of left greater saphenous vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity under its nominal scope. The recent opportunities tagged to this code do not involve vein occlusion procedures or the specific clinical intervention the code names. Instead, the posted solicitations span occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical procedure carve-out benefits for municipal employees, and specialty medical services for detained youth — none of which align with the percutaneous endoscopic vein-occlusion work the code describes. The mismatch suggests either inconsistent coding by the issuing bodies or a classification error in the source data.

The issuing bodies posting opportunities under this code include state transportation departments, county probation agencies, county health systems, and municipal retirement offices across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. The Washington State Department of Transportation posted the most narrowly scoped medical solicitation, requesting occupational medical surveillance services from board-certified occupational physicians across ferry system locations, with proposals due October 9, 2026. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office sought independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, due October 16, 2026. The geographic spread reflects scattered western and southern state activity, but the code itself does not appear to be driving procurement activity in its stated clinical domain.