UNSPSC 85531732: Supplement left lesser saphenous vein with synthetic substitute, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement left lesser saphenous vein with synthetic substitute, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06US3JZ

UNSPSC 85531732 Supplement left lesser saphenous vein with synthetic substitute, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code for a specific vascular surgical procedure. Recent state and local solicitations tagged under this code bear no relationship to the nominal scope — the code appears misapplied across the posted opportunities. The actual recent activity covers occupational medical surveillance, disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-out programs, and emergency medical services for detained youth. None of these services involve saphenous vein supplementation or percutaneous vascular surgery. The issuing bodies include state departments, counties, and municipalities: the Washington State Department of Transportation (on behalf of Washington State Ferries), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, the City of Long Beach, and the County of Santa Clara Health System. This code shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its procedural scope.

Geographic concentration is limited to four states — Washington, Texas, Arizona, California, and Florida — with no pattern suggesting sustained or repeat procurement activity in any jurisdiction. The Washington State Ferries occupational medical surveillance RFP (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026) and the City of Phoenix disability medical evaluation services RFP (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026) are the only solicitations with clear operational scope, neither of which involves the vascular procedure named in the code. The code's mismatch with actual buying activity suggests that vendors pursuing state and local work under this taxonomy should verify the substantive scope in each RFP or RFQ directly rather than relying on the UNSPSC classification.