UNSPSC 85531706: Restriction of right foot vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of right foot vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 06VT3CZ

UNSPSC 85531706 Restriction of right foot vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not match the work actually being solicited under it in recent state and local procurement. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure — percutaneous venous restriction — but the recent opportunities posted under this code span occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, medical record summarization for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-outs through Centers of Excellence networks, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for detained youth. None of these solicitations involve percutaneous venous restriction or any orthopedic vein-related procedures. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding in state and local procurement systems or use of a catch-all medical services code that bears no relationship to its formal definition.

The issuing bodies across these opportunities include state health systems, county procurement offices, city retirement boards, and county juvenile probation departments — a typical cross-section of public agencies. Recent geographic activity appears concentrated in the Southwest and West Coast: the City of Phoenix, City of Long Beach, Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County (Texas), Collier County (Florida), and Santa Clara County (California). The code shows no relevant recent activity aligned with its stated scope. Procurement professionals should treat this code as exhibiting classification drift rather than representing a coherent buying category, and should not rely on it for targeting percutaneous vascular procedure opportunities in state and local procurement.