UNSPSC 85523523: Occlusion of right hand vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of right hand vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 05LG3DZ

UNSPSC 85523523 Occlusion of right hand vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity aligned to its medical-device title. The six most recent state and local solicitations tagged with this code involve independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs for municipal employees, occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers, emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which concern vein occlusion devices or percutaneous vascular interventions. The code appears to have been misapplied across diverse healthcare-administration and occupational-health contexts unrelated to the procedural device the code nominally describes. State and local procurement bodies span city retirement offices (Phoenix), municipal human resources departments (Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington), county juvenile justice systems (Harris County, Texas), county benefits administration (Collier County, Florida), and county health systems (Santa Clara County, California).

The geographic spread covers Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington, with no discernible concentration. Without a single solicitation actually seeking vein-occlusion devices or related interventional supplies, this code presents no actionable market signal for business-development purposes. The misalignment between the code's procedural-device scope and the administrative and staffing services being solicited suggests either systematic miscoding at the source or that the code is inactive for state and local procurement of its intended product category.