UNSPSC 85523203: Restriction of left cephalic vein with extraluminal device, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of left cephalic vein with extraluminal device, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 05VF0CZ

UNSPSC 85523203 Restriction of left cephalic vein with extraluminal device, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the recent state and local procurement activity the source records under it. The code nominally describes a specific surgical intervention, yet the opportunities tagged to it span occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-out programs, and emergency medical services for detained youth — none of which involve vein restriction procedures or the clinical intervention the code names.

The source shows no recent state and local opportunities that actually procure the product or service the UNSPSC code describes. The mismatch between code taxonomy and actual solicitation scope suggests either a tagging error in the procurement system or use of this code as a catch-all for health-related services outside its nominal definition. The opportunities posted under this code between July and September 2026 span issuers in Arizona (City of Phoenix), California (City of Long Beach, County of Santa Clara), Texas (Harris County), Florida (Collier County), and Washington (Washington State Department of Transportation), but they reflect administrative healthcare contracting, medical staffing procurement, and benefits management rather than procedural surgery or device implantation. A vendor evaluating pursuit under this code should treat the code label as unreliable and examine each posted opportunity on its individual scope merits; the code itself offers no predictive signal about what state and local governments are buying or when to expect further activity in this classification.