UNSPSC 85523011: Restriction of upper vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of upper vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 05VY4CZ

UNSPSC 85523011 Restriction of upper vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its clinical procedure name and the state and local contract opportunities recently posted under it. The recent solicitations tagged to this code do not procure the specific medical device or surgical procedure named in the taxonomy; instead, they reflect a broader and more fragmented set of health administration, staffing, and benefit management services unrelated to upper-vein restriction procedures. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office is soliciting independent medical evaluation services for disability benefit determinations, the City of Long Beach is requesting surgical carve-out benefit program management, Washington State Ferries is purchasing occupational medical surveillance services, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department is seeking emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, Collier County is managing a pharmacy benefit administration contract, and Santa Clara County Health System is building a temporary health professional staffing pool. None of these solicitations involves procurement of the medical device or procedure specified in the code's name.

Geographic spread is concentrated in a small number of states—Arizona, California (Long Beach and Collier County), Washington State, Texas (Harris County), and a single California health authority—with no clear pattern of repeated activity in any jurisdiction. The representative opportunities span city retirement boards, county governments, state transportation agencies, county juvenile justice systems, and county health authorities, indicating no dominant issuing-body type. Given the lack of substantive alignment between the code's clinical scope and the work actually being solicited under it, this code appears to reflect a data-tagging mismatch in state and local procurement systems rather than a genuine market for the specified medical device or procedure.