UNSPSC 85522830: Occlusion of upper vein with intraluminal device, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of upper vein with intraluminal device, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 05LY0DZ

UNSPSC 85522830 Occlusion of upper vein with intraluminal device, open approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal relevance to the recent state and local contract opportunities posted under it. The code nominally describes a specific medical device procedure, yet the six opportunities posted in the past 90 days span independent medical evaluation services for disability pension determinations, surgical care carve-out benefit programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for youth in custody, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve vascular occlusion devices or surgical procedures matching the code's stated scope. This mismatch suggests the code may be miscoded in the state and local procurement database or used as a catch-all for medical services that do not fit other taxonomy categories.

The issuing bodies include municipal retirement systems (City of Phoenix), city HR departments (City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice authorities (Harris County), county health systems (Collier County, County of Santa Clara), suggesting broad cross-sector municipal and county engagement. Geographic activity centers on Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no single state showing concentrated volume. Without a meaningful alignment between the code definition and the actual services being procured, the code presents limited decision-value for targeting procurement strategy — vendors evaluating work under this code should verify the actual service requirement before investing in proposal development, as the taxonomy classification does not reliably predict the nature of work being solicited.