UNSPSC 85522811: Restriction of upper vein with extraluminal device, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of upper vein with extraluminal device, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 05VY0CZ

UNSPSC 85522811 Restriction of upper vein with extraluminal device, open approach is a Commodity code that does not align with the state and local procurement opportunities posted under it. The recent solicitations tagged to this code reflect comprehensive healthcare service delivery — inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care, peer support programs, and fire department medical direction — rather than the surgical procedure the code nominally describes. State and local governments are buying ongoing healthcare administration, management, and provider services under this designation, not implantable medical devices or surgical interventions.

The issuing bodies include county governments (Muscogee County Prison via Columbus Consolidated Government, Collier County, Monroe County, and San Mateo County) and municipal fire departments (Santa Monica Fire Department), with a geographic spread across Florida, Georgia, and California. Representative recent opportunities include Columbus Consolidated Government's RFP No. 26-0008 (due May 15, 2026) for inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison, Collier County Board of County Commissioners' RFP 25-8414 (due April 9, 2026) for pharmacy benefit management services covering 2,400 employees and 4,800 covered members with historical annual spending of approximately $8.7 million, and Monroe County's RFP628 (due April 16, 2026) for virtual primary and urgent care services for 2,300 county members effective October 1, 2026. The mismatch between the code's surgical scope and the healthcare administration work actually being procured suggests either a data-entry error in the state and local procurement system or use of the code as a catch-all for healthcare-related services. Firms pursuing opportunities in this space should verify the actual scope requirements directly from the issuing jurisdictions rather than relying on the code descriptor.