UNSPSC 85522128: Drainage of right subclavian vein with drainage device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of right subclavian vein with drainage device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 059540Z

UNSPSC 85522128 Drainage of right subclavian vein with drainage device, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) does not reflect the scope of work actually being solicited under this code in recent state and local opportunities. The recent postings tagged to this code span occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, and surgical benefit carve-out programs for public employees and detainees—none of which involve subclavian vein drainage or percutaneous endoscopic procedures. The code appears to be a clinical procedure taxonomy entry misapplied to administrative and employee-health-services solicitations, creating a fundamental mismatch between the code's clinical definition and the contracting activity actually occurring.

No relevant recent opportunities exist under this code. The six state and local postings in the source span the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (independent medical evaluation services for disability determinations), the City of Long Beach (surgical and medical procedure carve-out benefits for PPO employees), the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance for ferry employees), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (specialty and emergency medical services for detained youth), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary health professional staffing). The geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida, but none of these opportunities align with the code's stated clinical procedure scope. This code warrants review for recategorization or verification of proper taxonomy assignment in state procurement systems.