UNSPSC 85521803: Restriction of left subclavian vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of left subclavian vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 05V63CZ

UNSPSC 85521803 Restriction of left subclavian vein with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The three recent opportunities posted under this code—independent medical evaluations for public safety pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix), surgical and medical procedure carve-out benefits for municipal employees (City of Long Beach), and occupational medical surveillance for state ferry system workers (Washington State Department of Transportation)—involve administrative health services, benefits management, and occupational medicine screening rather than the specific vascular interventional procedure the code nominally describes. A fourth opportunity from Harris County Juvenile Probation Department seeks emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, and a fifth from Collier County addresses pharmacy benefit management services; neither involves the left subclavian vein restriction procedure. The code shows no alignment between its taxonomic name and what state and local governments are actually buying under the tag.

The recent opportunities that carry this UNSPSC number reflect a broader pattern of miscoding rather than genuine procurement demand for the vascular procedure itself. State and local issuing bodies—primarily large county health systems, municipal benefits administrators, state transportation agencies, and county human services departments—are using this code to tag medical administration and staffing services that belong in entirely different UNSPSC families. No representative opportunities target the procedure named in the code, and geographic spread across Arizona, California, Washington, Florida, and Texas reflects the location of issuing bodies, not the prevalence of procurement under the actual code definition. Business development professionals should treat this code as inactive for the stated commodity and verify correct UNSPSC classification before pursuing opportunities tagged under it.