UNSPSC 85516403: Bypass left popliteal artery to foot artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass left popliteal artery to foot artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 041N4ZP

UNSPSC 85516403 "Bypass left popliteal artery to foot artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach" is a Commodity code with minimal relevance to recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, yet the recent opportunities tagged under it do not procure surgical services matching that description. Instead, the solicitations cover independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), surgical procedure carve-out networks and Centers of Excellence for employee health plans (City of Long Beach), occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers (Washington State Department of Transportation), emergency and inpatient hospital services for detained youth (Harris County), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), and temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical specialties (County of Santa Clara Health System). None of these solicitations involve vascular or bypass procedures; the code's applicability appears to be a classification error rather than an accurate match to the work actually being procured.

The issuing bodies span state agencies, county governments, and municipal health systems across Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington. No repeat buyers appear in the recent-opportunities block. The geographic distribution includes activities in the Pacific Northwest (Washington), Southwest (Arizona), and multiple California and Florida jurisdictions, but the activity lacks coherence around the stated code definition. Because the code shows no meaningful alignment between its nominal scope and the actual state and local procurement activity it tags, it does not represent a viable business development target.