UNSPSC 85516117: Replacement of right anterior tibial artery with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to replacement of right anterior tibial artery with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 04RP4JZ

UNSPSC 85516117 Replacement of right anterior tibial artery with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows no relevant recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific vascular surgical procedure, yet the recent opportunities tagged under it — independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix Retirement Office), surgical benefit carve-out program management (City of Long Beach), occupational medical surveillance (Washington State Department of Transportation), specialty and emergency medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County Board of County Commissioners), and temporary health professional staffing (County of Santa Clara Health System) — are administrative, clinical support, and workforce-engagement services entirely unrelated to arterial replacement surgery or any specific procedure. The mislabeling suggests the code taxonomy has misclassified these opportunities or state and local procurement systems have tagged them incorrectly at the commodity level.

State and local buyers issuing under this code span county health systems, county procurement offices managing benefits and workforce services, state departments, and pension boards across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington. No meaningful pattern of purchasing activity for the code's actual commodity exists in the recent opportunities block. Given the complete mismatch between the code's stated scope and the work being solicited, the code is not actionable for vendors pursuing contracts aligned with the commodity's nominal definition.