UNSPSC 85516018: Restriction of right anterior tibial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of right anterior tibial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 04VP4CZ

UNSPSC 85516018 Restriction of right anterior tibial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect work actually being solicited by state and local governments under this designation. The recent opportunities posted under this code encompass occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, surgical procedure carve-out benefits for public employees, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, and emergency medical services for detained youth — none of which involve vascular surgical procedures or the specific endoscopic intervention named in the code. The code appears to be a clinical procedure taxonomy entry misapplied to general medical services and administrative healthcare procurement, indicating a significant mismatch between the UNSPSC classification and state and local buying activity.

No substantive recent procurements directly aligned with the code's stated scope are present in the source material. Buyers across this dataset include state health departments (Washington State Department of Transportation's medical surveillance for ferry employees), county systems (Collier County's pharmacy benefit management, Harris County Juvenile Probation's emergency medical services, Santa Clara Health System's health professional staffing), and municipal employees (City of Phoenix's disability medical evaluations, City of Long Beach's surgical carve-out networks), with activity spanning Washington, Arizona, California, and Florida. The mismatch between code classification and actual procurement suggests that vendors reviewing this Commodity code for business development purposes should verify current applicability before investing in pursuit strategy, as the code does not appear to track active state and local solicitation demand for the procedure it nominally describes.