UNSPSC 85515913: Dilation of left anterior tibial artery, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of left anterior tibial artery, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 047Q3ZZ

UNSPSC 85515913 (Dilation of left anterior tibial artery, percutaneous approach), a Commodity code, shows a material mismatch between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code's technical medical taxonomy—a specific cardiovascular procedure—does not align with what state and local governments are actually buying under this code tag. Recent opportunities fall into health benefit administration, occupational medicine, disability evaluation, and temporary clinical staffing rather than direct procurement of vascular dilation procedures or related clinical supplies.

The solicitations span diverse issuing bodies including city retirement boards (Phoenix Fire and Police Pension Boards), municipal health systems (City of Long Beach, County of Santa Clara Health System), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county juvenile justice departments (Harris County), and county benefits procurement offices (Collier County). Representative opportunities include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's RFP for independent medical evaluation services (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026) covering medical record review and scheduling of disability examinations; the Washington State Department of Transportation's RFP for occupational medical surveillance across 14 ferries locations (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026); and the County of Santa Clara Health System's solicitation for temporary health professional staffing qualification pools (RFSQHHSFY270052, due October 7, 2026). Geographic activity appears concentrated in Arizona, California, and Washington. The code's misclassification suggests either a data entry error in the state or local procurement database or a system-wide taxonomy mapping issue; firms pursuing opportunities in occupational medicine, benefits administration, or disability evaluation services should treat this code as mistagged and monitor issuing bodies directly rather than rely on this UNSPSC category for market signals.