UNSPSC 85515773: Repair left posterior tibial artery, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to repair left posterior tibial artery, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 04QS3ZZ

UNSPSC 85515773 Repair left posterior tibial artery, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the work actually being solicited under it in recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure, but the opportunities posted under this classification involve occupational health surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, surgical procedure carve-out networks, and emergency medical services for detained youth — none of which involve vascular repair. The mismatch suggests inconsistent or erroneous code assignment by issuing bodies rather than a coherent procurement category.

Recent opportunities appear across multiple issuing bodies and geographies: the Washington State Department of Transportation (occupational medical surveillance for ferry workers), Collier County Florida (pharmacy benefit management), Santa Clara County California (temporary ancillary clinical staffing), the City of Phoenix Arizona (disability retirement medical evaluations), the City of Long Beach California (surgical Centers of Excellence networks), and Harris County Texas (emergency and specialty medical services for juveniles in custody). The opportunities span contract types including RFPs and RFIs with response dates in September and October 2026 and contract values ranging from $750,000 over five years (Phoenix) to approximately $8.7 million annually (Collier County pharmacy). No clear repeat buyers or concentration pattern emerges; activity appears geographically dispersed across Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and Washington. Given the divergence between the code's nominal scope and the actual work being purchased, this code does not represent a coherent procurement segment for business development purposes.