UNSPSC 85514556: Bypass left common iliac artery to celiac artery with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass left common iliac artery to celiac artery with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 041D4J1

UNSPSC 85514556 Bypass left common iliac artery to celiac artery with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a specific surgical procedure — a vascular bypass using synthetic material via endoscopic technique — but the recent opportunities posted under this code do not procure surgical procedures themselves. Instead, state and local issuing bodies have tagged the code against services spanning independent medical evaluations for disability determinations, surgical benefit administration and Center of Excellence networks, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty healthcare for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing. None of these solicitations involve procurement of the specific surgical intervention the code names.

The geographic spread of recent activity extends across Arizona (Phoenix), California (Long Beach and Santa Clara County), Washington (WSDOT/Washington State Ferries), Florida (Collier County), and Texas (Harris County). The issuing bodies include a city retirement office, a municipal government, a state department of transportation, a county health system, a county board of commissioners, a county juvenile probation department, and a county health care consortium. Because the code does not match the work actually being bought, the summary concludes that UNSPSC 85514556 carries little decision-relevant procurement signal for firms pursuing state and local opportunities in healthcare or medical services — the code appears to be a categorical misfiling across multiple unrelated service categories rather than an active procurement stream.