UNSPSC 85514411: Bypass right internal iliac artery to right internal iliac artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right internal iliac artery to right internal iliac artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 041E4Z9

UNSPSC 85514411 Bypass right internal iliac artery to right internal iliac artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity for state and local procurement. The code nominally designates a specific vascular surgical procedure, yet none of the recent state and local contract opportunities posted under this code reflect purchasing of that procedure or related vascular interventions. Instead, the recent solicitations tagged to this code span independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which align with the code's stated procedure scope. This mismatch suggests either a classification error in how jurisdictions have tagged these opportunities or that the code carries a broader definitional scope in practice than its procedure name indicates.

The recent opportunities themselves span a diverse mix of issuing bodies: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office, the City of Long Beach, the Washington State Department of Transportation on behalf of Washington State Ferries, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, Collier County Board of County Commissioners, and the County of Santa Clara Health System. These fall across cities, counties, special-purpose districts, and state agencies in Arizona, California, Washington, and Florida. Because the code does not cleanly map to the work actually being solicited, the data does not support reliable characterization of geographic concentration or repeat-buyer patterns. Practitioners evaluating this code should treat the nominal procedure title as authoritative rather than relying on recent posted opportunities for scope guidance, and should clarify internally whether state and local procurement offices in their target markets are using this code for vascular procedures or applying it to broader medical service categories by mistake.