UNSPSC 85513702: Insertion of infusion device into left peroneal artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to insertion of infusion device into left peroneal artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 04HU43Z

UNSPSC 85513702 "Insertion of infusion device into left peroneal artery, percutaneous endoscopic approach" is a Commodity code that does not map to the scope of state and local procurement activity in the source. The recent opportunities tagged under this code are soliciting occupational medical surveillance services, independent medical evaluations for disability retirement determinations, surgical procedure carve-out benefits for municipal employees, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, specialty medical services for detained youth, and emergency medical care coordination—none of which involve infusion device insertion or peroneal artery procedures. The code's nominal scope describes a specific clinical intervention, yet the state and local market activity it is being applied to covers administrative health program management, employee benefit design, medical record review, occupational health compliance, and staffing coordination. This represents a fundamental mismatch between the code taxonomy and actual purchasing behavior under it.

The issuing bodies across these opportunities span city pension boards (City of Phoenix), municipal employees and retirees (City of Long Beach), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), county health systems (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, County of Santa Clara), and county government employee benefit programs (Collier County Board of County Commissioners). Because the code does not align with the substantive work being solicited, there is no reliable signal about geographic concentration, repeat buyers, or genuine market demand under this code. The source shows recent RFP and RFQ activity from Arizona, California, Washington, Florida, and Texas, but the mismatch between code label and procurement substance means this code should not be relied upon to predict state and local buying patterns in medical device insertion or cardiovascular intervention services.