UNSPSC 85513643: Occlusion of right internal iliac artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to occlusion of right internal iliac artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 04LE4CZ

UNSPSC 85513643 Occlusion of right internal iliac artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that describes a highly specific vascular intervention procedure. The recent state and local solicitations tagged under this code, however, show no direct procurement activity for the procedure itself. Instead, the opportunities span occupational medical surveillance, independent medical evaluation services for pension benefit determinations, pharmacy benefit management, specialty surgical networks, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which involve vascular occlusion devices or endoscopic arterial procedures. The code appears to be a classification mismatch within state and local procurement systems; the opportunities do not reflect demand for the medical device or procedure the code nominally describes. Issuing bodies include city retirement offices (Phoenix), county health systems (Santa Clara, Harris County), state transportation agencies (Washington Department of Transportation), and municipal employee benefit programs (Long Beach), but they are procuring administrative, staffing, and clinical management services rather than the specific medical device or intervention encoded here.

Because the tagged opportunities do not correspond to the Commodity code's actual scope, this code shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity. A business development professional evaluating opportunities under this code should verify with procurement offices whether the code is being applied correctly or whether it has been misassigned in their internal systems. The mismatch suggests either data quality issues in the tagging layer or the code's disuse in state and local purchasing, neither of which supports a pursuit decision based on the available evidence.