UNSPSC 85513437: Supplement left colic artery with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement left colic artery with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 04U74KZ

UNSPSC 85513437 Supplement left colic artery with nonautologous tissue substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code with no relevant recent state and local contract activity. The code describes a highly specialized surgical intervention—vascular repair via endoscopic catheterization — that does not align with the procurement activities state and local agencies are currently conducting under this classification. Recent opportunities posted against this code involve disability pension medical evaluations (City of Phoenix), surgical benefit carve-out programs (City of Long Beach), occupational health surveillance (Washington State Department of Transportation), youth detention healthcare services (Harris County), pharmacy benefit management (Collier County), and temporary clinical staffing (Santa Clara County Health System). None of these solicitations involve vascular supplementation, arterial repair, tissue grafting, or endoscopic surgical procedures; the code assignment appears to reflect administrative cataloging misalignment rather than actual procurement scope.

State and local buyers posting opportunities under this code are issuing RFPs and RFQs across diverse service categories — employee health benefits administration, detention facility medical services, and clinical staffing — with response dates spanning July through October 2026. The geographic footprint includes Arizona, California, Florida, Washington, and Texas; no pattern of repeat buyers or concentrated regional activity emerges from the recent record. The mismatch between the code's anatomical specificity and the generalist health-services nature of the opportunities suggests either data-entry error at the issuing-body level or a systematic cataloging practice that does not reflect procurement reality. Vendors evaluating this code should verify actual buyer intent through direct inquiry before investing proposal resources.