UNSPSC 85505183: Dilation of right brachial artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of right brachial artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 03774DZ

UNSPSC 85505183, Dilation of right brachial artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach, is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity under state and local procurement. The code nominally describes a specific interventional vascular procedure, yet the state and local opportunities tagged to it span independent medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, occupational health surveillance, surgical carve-out networks, temporary health professional staffing, and youth detention medical services — none of which align with procurement of the brachial artery dilation procedure itself or equipment directly supporting it. The mismatch suggests either miscoding in the state and local systems or that the code has been repurposed at the jurisdiction level to classify broader health services categories unrelated to the procedure's clinical definition.

The recent opportunities span Arizona, California, Washington, Texas, and Florida jurisdictions, including the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (disability medical evaluations), the City of Long Beach (surgical procedure carve-out benefits), the Washington State Department of Transportation ferries division (occupational medical surveillance), Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (specialty medical services), Collier County Commissioners (pharmacy benefit management), and the County of Santa Clara Health System (temporary health professional staffing). No single issuing body repeats, and the work scopes range from benefits administration to clinical staffing to occupational health compliance. The code does not appear to drive meaningful procurement activity in its stated clinical domain within the state and local market.