UNSPSC 85504621: Restriction of left brachial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of left brachial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 03V83CZ

UNSPSC 85504621 Restriction of left brachial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that bears no meaningful relationship to the recent state and local procurement opportunities posted under it. The code's technical clinical descriptor — a specific interventional cardiology procedure — does not align with any of the six opportunities in the source block, which span occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent disability medical evaluations, surgical care networks, and emergency youth detention medical services. State and local procurement systems occasionally tag health care and human services solicitations with medical procedure codes that do not match the actual work being purchased; this code shows little relevant recent activity.

The recent opportunities posted under this code originate from diverse issuing bodies — county human resources departments and health systems (Collier County, Santa Clara County), municipal pension boards (Phoenix), state transportation agencies (Washington State Department of Transportation), and county juvenile justice departments (Harris County) — but none involve the brachial artery restriction procedure or related interventional services. The geographic spread includes Arizona, California, Florida, Washington, and Texas, but this distribution reflects the various health care and staffing procurement needs of those jurisdictions rather than activity in the code's stated scope. Given the persistent mismatch between the code and the actual work being solicited, firms evaluating this code should treat recent activity signals with caution and focus business development on codes that more directly track the clinical services or health system operations they provide.