UNSPSC 85503722: Removal of extraluminal device from upper artery, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to removal of extraluminal device from upper artery, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 03PY3CZ

UNSPSC 85503722 Removal of extraluminal device from upper artery, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code whose title describes a medical procedure rather than a product or service state and local governments routinely procure. The recent state and local solicitations tagged with this code do not reflect the procedural content embedded in the code name; instead, they span institutional healthcare administration, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary care platforms, peer mental health support services, and fire department medical direction. The code shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its nominal scope of extraluminal arterial device removal. No state or local government solicitations in the recent-opportunities block solicit the procedure named in the code or related medical device removal services.

The five posted opportunities span four states—Georgia (Muscogee County Prison inmate medical and pharmacy services), Florida (Collier County pharmacy benefit management and Monroe County virtual primary care), and California (San Mateo County peer support services and Santa Monica Fire Department medical direction)—and involve diverse issuing bodies including county boards of commissioners, a consolidated city government purchasing division, a county behavioral health services division, and a municipal fire department. Response deadlines have passed or are approaching for four of the five solicitations (Collier County closed April 9, 2026; Muscogee County closed May 15, 2026; Monroe County due April 16, 2026; San Mateo County due July 2, 2025). The code appears to be a misclassification or data-quality issue rather than an active procurement category; prospective vendors should verify the actual UNSPSC taxonomy applicable to their healthcare contracting focus before relying on this code for opportunity identification.