UNSPSC 85502435: Dilation of right subclavian artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to dilation of right subclavian artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 03734DZ

UNSPSC 85502435 Dilation of right subclavian artery with intraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under its nominal scope. The code is a procedure-specific medical device code corresponding to a single vascular intervention technique, yet the state and local opportunities tagged to it reflect institutional healthcare administration, occupational health surveillance, and pharmacy benefit management—none of which involve subclavian artery dilation or the specified device.

The six recent state and local solicitations posted between July and September 2026 span independent medical evaluation services for pension disability determinations (City of Phoenix, RFP RTMRFP26001 due October 16, 2026), surgical procedure carve-out networks (City of Long Beach, RFP HR26753 due October 7, 2026), occupational medical surveillance for ferry system employees (Washington State Department of Transportation, RFP RFP20260825 due October 9, 2026), emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth (Harris County Juvenile Probation Department, RFI 071626BNM due September 25, 2026), pharmacy benefit management administration (Collier County Board of County Commissioners, RFP 25-8414 due April 9, 2026), and temporary health professional staffing services (County of Santa Clara Health System, RFQ RFSQHHSFY270052 due October 7, 2026). These opportunities originate from state departments, county health systems, counties, cities, and special districts across Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, but none involve procurement of the specific procedure or device named in the code. The code appears to reflect a taxonomy misclassification rather than active state and local procurement demand.