UNSPSC 85501952: Bypass right subclavian artery to bilateral upper arm artery with synthetic substitute, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass right subclavian artery to bilateral upper arm artery with synthetic substitute, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 03130J2

UNSPSC 85501952 Bypass right subclavian artery to bilateral upper arm artery with synthetic substitute, open approach is a Commodity code whose nominal title describes a specific vascular surgical procedure, but recent state and local procurement activity under this code shows little alignment with that scope. The code shows minimal relevant activity; the posted opportunities are primarily health benefit administration, occupational medical surveillance, independent medical evaluations for pension disability determinations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary clinical staffing, and emergency medical services for youth detention—none of which involve the surgical procedure the code nominally describes.

Geographic activity spanning the recent opportunities includes Arizona, California, Florida, and Washington, with no concentration in any single jurisdiction or region. Representative recent solicitations include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's request for independent medical evaluation services (RFP RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026), the Washington State Department of Transportation's occupational medical surveillance procurement for Washington State Ferries (RFP RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026), the City of Long Beach's surgical benefit carve-out program for its health plan (RFP HR26753, due October 7, 2026), and Collier County's pharmacy benefit management services RFP (RFP 25-8414). The code's nominal scope—a vascular bypass surgical procedure—does not match what state and local buyers are actually sourcing under this taxonomy entry, suggesting either a tagging error in the procurement system or use of the code as a catch-all for health-services contracting that does not fit other categories.