UNSPSC 85501419: Restriction of intracranial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of intracranial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 03VG4CZ

UNSPSC 85501419 Restriction of intracranial artery with extraluminal device, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not align with recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a surgical procedure involving neurovascular intervention; however, the recent opportunities tagged under it reflect occupational and disability medical evaluation services, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, and surgical benefit carve-out programs—none of which involve intracranial procedures or the specific device-based interventions the code names. The mismatch suggests either misclassification by issuing bodies or a misapplication of the code to broader occupational health and benefits administration work.

Recent activity under this code shows no consistent pattern of intracranial procedure procurement. The largest recent opportunity—Collier County's Pharmacy Benefit Management Services RFP (258414), due April 9, 2026—is unrelated to the code's scope; other posted solicitations include the City of Phoenix Retirement Office's independent medical evaluation services (RTMRFP26001, due October 16, 2026), the City of Long Beach's surgical benefit carve-out for Centers of Excellence (HR26753, due October 7, 2026), and the Washington State Department of Transportation's occupational medical surveillance contract (RFP20260825, due October 9, 2026). State bodies including Washington State, Harris County, Santa Clara County, and Florida municipalities have posted opportunities, but these cover disability assessment, employee health examinations, and benefits administration rather than neurovascular surgery. The code shows little active market demand for the procedure it nominally describes and appears to reflect administrative miscoding rather than genuine procurement of intracranial artery restriction services.