UNSPSC 85494601: Restriction of superior vena cava, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to restriction of superior vena cava, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 02VV3ZZ

UNSPSC 85494601 Restriction of superior vena cava, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code whose title does not align with the state and local procurement activity currently posted under it. The recent opportunities tagged to this code reflect comprehensive healthcare service procurement — inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care, peer support services, and fire department medical direction — rather than the specific interventional medical procedure the code name describes. State and local agencies are using this code to solicit broad healthcare administration and delivery contracts, not individual clinical procedures.

Activity under the code spans state departments, county health agencies, county commissions, and municipal fire departments across multiple states. The Columbus Consolidated Government's Finance Department issued RFP No. 26-0008 (due May 15, 2026) for comprehensive inmate medical and pharmacy services at Muscogee County Prison in Georgia; Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division issued RFP 25-8414 (due April 9, 2026) for pharmacy benefit management services covering approximately 2,400 enrolled employees and 4,800 covered members in Florida; Monroe County, Florida Board of County Commissioners issued an RFP (due April 16, 2026) for virtual primary care and 24/7 urgent care services; San Mateo County Health in California issued RFP No. 2025-007 for peer support services for peer workers; and Santa Monica Fire Department in California issued an RFP for a fire department medical director position. The code shows recent activity concentrated in Florida, California, and Georgia, though the mismatch between the code's clinical procedure name and the healthcare services actually being procured suggests this may be a data-entry or categorization issue rather than a reliable indicator of genuine procurement patterns under the code's intended scope.