UNSPSC 85494326: Supplement mitral valve with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to supplement mitral valve with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 02UG4JZ

UNSPSC 85494326 Supplement mitral valve with synthetic substitute, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that does not match the work being solicited under it in recent state and local opportunities. The code's nominal scope describes a specific cardiac surgical procedure, but the recent opportunities posted against this code span inmate medical and pharmacy services, pharmacy benefit management, virtual primary and urgent care services, peer support for behavioral health workers, and fire department medical direction — none of which involve mitral valve replacement or cardiac intervention. The mismatch indicates that this code is being misapplied by issuing bodies or aggregator platforms and does not represent a coherent procurement category in state and local practice.

The four recent opportunities sourced under this code originate from disparate jurisdictions — Muscogee County (Georgia), Collier County (Florida), Monroe County (Florida), San Mateo County (California), and the City of Santa Monica (California) — and span county healthcare administration, correctional health services, benefits consulting, and municipal fire department medical direction. No issuing body appears more than once. No geographic concentration is evident. The opportunities reflect fragmented, episodic procurement rather than a market segment with consistent demand or specialized vendor participation. If your firm pursues opportunities tagged to this code, verify the actual scope of work against the UNSPSC classification before committing resources — the tagging appears unreliable, and the code itself does not define a meaningful procurement category for state and local buyers.