UNSPSC 85494252: Release tricuspid valve, percutaneous approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to release tricuspid valve, percutaneous approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 02NJ3ZZ

UNSPSC 85494252 Release tricuspid valve, percutaneous approach is a Commodity code that nominally describes a specific cardiac surgical device and procedure, but state and local government procurement activity under this code bears little relationship to that scope. The recent opportunities posted under this code cover inmate medical and pharmacy services for county correctional facilities, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary care and urgent care services, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical director services. None of these solicitations involve tricuspid valve devices or percutaneous cardiac procedures, suggesting either systematic miscoding in the issuing bodies' procurement systems or a mismatch between the UNSPSC taxonomy and how state and local agencies classify healthcare services contracts.

The active solicitations come from county governments—Muscogee County (Georgia), Collier County (Florida), and Monroe County (Florida)—and special-purpose districts including San Mateo County (California) behavioral health and the Santa Monica Fire Department (California). The Muscogee County Prison medical services RFP (due May 15, 2026) seeks comprehensive healthcare for approximately 576 inmates with current monthly costs of $95,537.71; the Collier County pharmacy benefit management RFP (due April 9, 2026) covers 2,400 employees and 4,800 members with historical annual spending near $8.7 million; and the Monroe County virtual care RFP (due April 16, 2026) addresses approximately 2,300 county members. These opportunities span Georgia and Florida with a secondary presence in California. The code shows fragmented activity across unrelated healthcare service lines rather than a coherent product or service family, suggesting it may not be a reliable indicator of actual state and local procurement intent in this area.