UNSPSC 85492902: Revision of synthetic substitute in great vessel, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to revision of synthetic substitute in great vessel, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 02WY4JZ

UNSPSC 85492902 Revision of synthetic substitute in great vessel, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows a substantial mismatch between its nominal scope — a highly specific surgical procedure — and the medical-services activities state and local governments are actually soliciting. The recent opportunities block contains no solicitations for revision of synthetic vascular substitutes or related surgical procedures. Instead, the code has been tagged on a diverse set of health services procurements including occupational medical surveillance, independent disability medical evaluations, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, surgical benefit carve-out programs, and specialty medical care for youth in detention. None of these activities align with the code's stated procedure-level scope. State and local issuing bodies appear to be using this code incorrectly or as a catch-all for medical-services categories that lack a precise commodity mapping.

The recent-opportunities block documents activity from California, Arizona, Florida, and Washington state, with issuing bodies spanning county health systems, county boards of commissioners, state departments, city retirement offices, and county juvenile authorities. Geographic concentration is insufficient to characterize a focused market. Because the code does not support recent solicitations for the service it nominally describes, the code carries minimal decision-relevance for vendors in the vascular-surgery supply or surgical-services space. Firms pursuing occupational health, medical staffing, or pharmacy-benefits work may encounter this code tag in state and local procurement systems, but the mismatch signals potential confusion in the buyer's classification process rather than a reliable indicator of actual opportunity volume.