UNSPSC 85491319: Bypass coronary artery, four or more sites from abdominal artery with autologous arterial tissue, open approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to bypass coronary artery, four or more sites from abdominal artery with autologous arterial tissue, open approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 02130AF

UNSPSC 85491319 Bypass coronary artery, four or more sites from abdominal artery with autologous arterial tissue, open approach is a Commodity code that does not reflect the work actually being solicited by state and local governments under this designation. Recent state and local opportunities posted under this code describe occupational medical surveillance, pharmacy benefit management, temporary health professional staffing, independent medical evaluations for pension and disability determinations, and specialty surgical network carve-out programs — none of which align with the specific cardiac surgical procedure named in the code itself. The mismatch indicates either classification error in the issuing bodies' procurement systems or a systematic misalignment between the UNSPSC taxonomy and actual state and local health-related buying activity.

The recent-opportunities block shows no procurement activity for cardiac bypass surgery or related cardiothoracic procedures. The City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), City of Long Beach (California), Washington State Department of Transportation, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and Santa Clara County Health System (California) have all posted opportunities under this code, but each solicits administrative health services, benefits management, or temporary staffing support rather than surgical procedures or implantable cardiac devices. The code shows activity across four states (Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas), but the substantive procurement mismatch suggests this code is either underutilized for its stated purpose or has become a default placeholder for health-services spending that does not fit elsewhere in the taxonomy.