UNSPSC 85482140: Drainage of sacral nerve, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to drainage of sacral nerve, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 019R4ZZ

UNSPSC 85482140 Drainage of sacral nerve, percutaneous endoscopic approach (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under this code. The recent state and local opportunities tagged to this UNSPSC do not reflect the specialized surgical or procedural scope the code nominates. Instead, the opportunities captured address healthcare administration, management services, and primary care delivery—inmate medical and pharmacy services for a county correctional facility, pharmacy benefit management for county employees, virtual primary and urgent care platforms, peer support services for mental health workers, and fire department medical director oversight. None of these solicitations involve drainage procedures, sacral nerve interventions, or endoscopic surgical work. The code-to-opportunity mismatch suggests either a cataloging error in the state and local procurement systems or that this specific procedural code does not see regular state and local government demand.

The issuing bodies include county corrections departments, county human resources and benefits divisions, county health departments, county behavioral health services, and municipal fire departments across Florida, Georgia, and California. Geographic activity is concentrated in Florida (Collier and Monroe counties) and Georgia (Muscogee County), with California representation through San Mateo County. No standardized volume, pricing, or set-aside patterns emerge from the opportunities shown because the work itself falls outside the code's nominal clinical scope. Procurement professionals should verify whether opportunities are being miscoded or whether this code represents minimal state and local demand; direct engagement with county purchasing offices in the states showing activity may clarify coding conventions and help identify where actual procedural or surgical procurement occurs.