UNSPSC 85473302: Destruction of thoracic spinal cord, percutaneous endoscopic approach

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a surgical intervention or procedure to destruction of thoracic spinal cord, percutaneous endoscopic approach. This surgical intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code 005X4ZZ

UNSPSC 85473302 Destruction of thoracic spinal cord, percutaneous endoscopic approach is a Commodity code that shows little relevant recent activity. The code's nominal scope — a specific surgical procedure — does not match the work actually being solicited under it in the recent state and local opportunities block. The six posted solicitations involve independent medical evaluation services for disability retirement determinations, surgical benefit carve-out programs, occupational medical surveillance, emergency and specialty medical services for detained youth, pharmacy benefit management administration, and temporary health professional staffing across multiple ancillary clinical categories. None of these scopes align with thoracic spinal cord destruction via percutaneous endoscopic approach, suggesting either a cataloging mismatch or minimal procurement activity under this specific procedural code at the state and local level.

The issuing bodies posting under this code span diverse public jurisdictions: the City of Phoenix Retirement Office (Arizona), the City of Long Beach (California), the Washington State Department of Transportation on behalf of Washington State Ferries, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Texas), Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), and Santa Clara County Health System (California). Geographic activity appears concentrated in California, Arizona, Texas, Washington, and Florida, with no evident repeat buyers. Because the recent opportunities do not represent procurement of the service named in the code's title, this code warrants close due-diligence review before pursuing opportunities posted under it — the mismatch between code name and actual scope signals either data quality issues or a very thin market for the specified procedure at the state and local level.