UNSPSC 85408313: Diagnosis of extra marker chromosomes

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Extra marker chromosomes. Extra marker chromosomes is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as a four digit category under code Q92. 6

UNSPSC 85408313 Diagnosis of extra marker chromosomes is a Commodity code under which state and local governments procure specialized diagnostic imaging and laboratory services for clinical operations. Recent solicitations show substantial mismatch between the code's nominal scope and actual procurement activity: the three recent state-local opportunities posted under this code cover diagnostic imaging system infrastructure (a PACS platform for radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging), ultrasound equipment procurement, and phlebotomy blood draw services—none of which directly address chromosomal diagnosis. The code shows little activity aligned with its stated purpose. State and local issuing bodies using this code include San Mateo County (operating a public hospital system), Collier County in Florida (health services), and the City of Albuquerque through its Police Department (law enforcement evidence services). The geographic spread across California, Florida, and New Mexico suggests limited regional concentration.

Representative recent opportunities include San Mateo Medical Center's RFP for a diagnostic imaging PACS system with proposals due August 7, 2026, supporting 65,000 annual radiology studies with 9–12 month implementation and five-year term; Collier County's Notice of Intent to Single Source EchoNous, Inc. for KOSMOS platform ultrasound equipment and a five-year warranty (posted April 1, 2026, with a March 26, 2026 response deadline); and the Albuquerque Police Department's RFB for on-call phlebotomy blood draw services covering 300 anticipated annual calls with 24/7 coverage across Bernalillo County, with bids due February 25, 2026. The code's tagging appears to reflect administrative misclassification rather than genuine procurement activity in chromosomal diagnostics; state and local procurement professionals evaluating this code should verify that solicitations are correctly categorized before committing resources.