UNSPSC 85405605: Diagnosis of duplication of ureter

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Duplication of ureter. Duplication of ureter is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as a four digit category under code Q62. 5

UNSPSC 85405605 Diagnosis of duplication of ureter is a Commodity code that nominally describes a specific urological diagnostic service, but the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it do not reflect urological or renal diagnostic work. Instead, the tagged solicitations span diagnostic imaging systems, special education contracted services, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which align with the code's stated scope. San Mateo County's Diagnostic Imaging PACS solicitation addresses enterprise radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging infrastructure; Birdville Independent School District's special education services cover audiologists, diagnosticians, dyslexia evaluators, and therapists; and Santa Clara County Health System's temporary staffing vehicle includes audiology, diagnostic imaging/radiology, and therapy services among thirteen ancillary clinical categories. The code shows little relevant recent activity directly tied to ureter duplication diagnosis or nephrology-focused diagnostic services.

The three posted opportunities span California (San Mateo and Santa Clara counties) and Texas (Tarrant County school district), with response dates clustering in October 2026. San Mateo Medical Center's RFP for PACS closed October 21, 2026 and involves a five-year agreement requiring EPIC integration and 99.9% uptime; Birdville ISD's competitive sealed proposal for special education contracted services also closed October 21, 2026, with contract term December 1, 2026 through November 30, 2027 and optional three-year renewals; Santa Clara Health System's non-exclusive multiple-award qualification pool closed October 7, 2026 with no guaranteed work and a five-year qualified list term. The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the solicitations tagged under it suggests either classification error in the source data or minimal procurement activity under the intended urological diagnostic code at the state and local level.