UNSPSC 85405003: Diagnosis of congenital rectovaginal fistula

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Congenital rectovaginal fistula. Congenital rectovaginal fistula is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as a four digit category under code Q52. 2

UNSPSC 85405003 Diagnosis of congenital rectovaginal fistula (Commodity) shows little relevant recent activity under its nominal scope. The three most recent state and local opportunities posted under this code—a diagnostic imaging PACS system procurement at San Mateo Medical Center, special education contracted services at Birdville Independent School District, and temporary health professional staffing services at Santa Clara Health System—are not related to the diagnosis of congenital rectovaginal fistula. The code appears to have been incorrectly applied to these solicitations; they represent enterprise health IT infrastructure, school-based special education services, and clinical staffing respectively, rather than diagnostic procedures for a specific pediatric or gynecological condition. State and local procurement systems sometimes misclassify opportunities at the commodity tier when assigning UNSPSC codes to broad health service categories, particularly when the solicitation scope encompasses multiple service lines or when the posting system defaults to a high-level code.

No recent state and local solicitations specifically targeting diagnosis of congenital rectovaginal fistula services or related diagnostic procedures appear in the source data. If your firm provides imaging, surgical consultation, or clinical diagnostic services related to anorectal or gynecological reconstruction, monitoring activity in the health services codes above the commodity tier and directly contact procurement offices at large regional health systems and county hospital networks in California (San Mateo, Santa Clara), Texas (Tarrant County), and comparable jurisdictions. The mismatch between the code and actual recent solicitations suggests the category may see minimal independent procurement activity at the state and local level.