UNSPSC 85366805: Diagnosis of habitual aborter

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Habitual aborter

UNSPSC 85366805 Diagnosis of habitual aborter (Commodity) shows minimal alignment between the code's nominal scope and the state and local opportunities actually being solicited under it. Recent state and local activity tagged to this code encompasses diagnostic imaging systems, ultrasound equipment, and phlebotomy services — none of which fall within the obstetric diagnostic niche the code name suggests. The three most recent opportunities reflect healthcare infrastructure and clinical laboratory support across different institutional contexts: a county hospital system's enterprise imaging platform, a single-source ultrasound equipment procurement, and police department on-call phlebotomy services.

Issuing bodies span county health systems, county procurement services, and municipal police departments across California, Florida, and New Mexico. The most substantial recent solicitation is San Mateo Medical Center's RFP for a Diagnostic Imaging PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System), due August 7, 2026, which seeks enterprise-grade imaging software with EPIC EHR integration to support 65,000 annual radiology studies, 5,000 cardiology studies, and 8,000 mammography interpretations, with migration from a legacy ScImage system and a 5-year agreement term; the procurement applies a 5-10% local preference under San Mateo County Ordinance Code Chapter 2.89. Collier County, Florida, issued a Notice of Intent to Single Source EchoNous, Inc., posted April 1, 2026, for KOSMOS platform ultrasound equipment with a 5-year warranty and related software licensing. The Albuquerque Police Department issued an RFB for on-call blood draw services, due February 25, 2026, anticipating approximately 300 service calls annually across Bernalillo County with a three-year initial term renewable for up to two additional one-year periods. The code shows scattered activity with no apparent repeat buyers, and the opportunities do not represent a coherent procurement category — the tagging appears incidental rather than reflective of genuine demand within the stated commodity scope.