UNSPSC 85333602: Diagnosis of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as a four digit category under code K31. 1

UNSPSC 85333602 Diagnosis of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a Commodity code that appears to describe a specific clinical diagnostic procedure, yet the recent state and local solicitations tagged under this code show little alignment with that narrow scope. The three most recent opportunities posted between July and October 2026 focus instead on diagnostic imaging systems infrastructure, special education contracted services, and temporary health professional staffing — none of which center on diagnosis of pyloric stenosis. This mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding at the issuing bodies or that the code is being applied as a catch-all for broader diagnostic and health professional services. The actual work solicited reflects general diagnostic capability procurement rather than stenosis-specific diagnosis.

Recent activity spans three states and covers county health systems and school districts as primary issuing bodies. San Mateo Medical Center in California posted an RFP on October 7, 2026 (due October 21, 2026) for enterprise-grade diagnostic imaging PACS implementation supporting radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging with EPIC integration and data migration from legacy systems; Santa Clara County Health System in California posted an RFQ on July 7, 2026 (due October 7, 2026) to establish a qualified vendor pool for temporary staffing across 13 ancillary clinical categories including diagnostic imaging and audiology; and Birdville Independent School District in Texas posted a competitive sealed proposal request on September 18, 2026 (due October 21, 2026) for special education contracted services including audiologists and diagnosticians. The code shows activity in California and Texas but no clear pattern of repeat buyers or concentrated procurement in any single jurisdiction. The disconnect between the code's nominal scope and the actual opportunities being solicited signals either data quality issues at the source or that this code should be avoided in favor of higher-tier family or class codes that better align with the health systems' actual service needs.