UNSPSC 85276002: Diagnosis of hyperkinetic conduct disorder

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Hyperkinetic conduct disorder. Hyperkinetic conduct disorder is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as a four digit category under code F90. 1

UNSPSC 85276002 Diagnosis of hyperkinetic conduct disorder, a Commodity code, shows minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The three most recent opportunities posted under this code involve diagnostic imaging systems (a PACS implementation), ultrasound equipment procurement, and phlebotomy blood draw services — none of which directly address the diagnosis of conduct disorder. State and local issuers using this code include a county health system (San Mateo Medical Center in California), a county procurement office (Collier County, Florida), and a municipal police department (Albuquerque, New Mexico). The work being solicited spans enterprise health information technology implementation, specialized medical device procurement, and clinical laboratory services rather than behavioral health assessment or diagnostic protocols specific to hyperkinetic conduct disorder.

Recent activity appears concentrated in the Western and Southwestern United States, with postings from California, Florida, and New Mexico between January and July 2026. The most substantial opportunity is San Mateo County's Diagnostic Imaging PACS procurement (RFP, due August 7, 2026), which requires enterprise-grade picture archiving and communication system implementation supporting radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging with EPIC Electronic Health Record integration and 99.9% uptime. Collier County's single-source notice for EchoNous KOSMOS ultrasound equipment (posted April 1, 2026, due March 26, 2026) and Albuquerque Police Department's request for on-call phlebotomy services (RFB, due February 25, 2026) represent the other recent tagged opportunities. The code's current application to general diagnostic and clinical services rather than behavioral health assessment suggests either mis-tagging at the jurisdiction level or a substantive mismatch between the code's stated purpose and state and local procurement practice.