UNSPSC 85271706: Diagnosis of organic dissociative disorder

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Organic dissociative disorder. Organic dissociative disorder is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as a four digit category under code F06. 5

UNSPSC 85271706 Diagnosis of organic dissociative disorder is a Commodity code that shows a significant mismatch between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code's title suggests clinical diagnostic assessment for a specific psychiatric condition, yet the three recent opportunities posted under it involve medical imaging systems infrastructure, school district special education contracted services, and health system temporary staffing placement. None of these solicitations involve diagnosis of dissociative disorder as described in the code name. The opportunities instead reflect broader healthcare service delivery, educational support contracting, and clinical workforce augmentation — work that does not align with the code's stated clinical focus.

San Mateo Medical Center (a county health system in California) posted an RFP on October 7, 2026 for a Diagnostic Imaging PACS system due October 21, 2026, requiring enterprise-grade radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging infrastructure with EPIC integration; Birdville Independent School District (northeast Texas) posted a competitive sealed proposal on September 18, 2026 for special education contracted services across multiple specialties (audiologist, diagnostician, speech language therapist, occupational therapist, and others) due October 21, 2026; and Santa Clara County Health System (California) posted a non-exclusive multiple-award RFQ on July 7, 2026 for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories including audiology, diagnostic imaging, and therapy services, due October 7, 2026. The geographic spread across California and Texas, combined with the absence of opportunities matching the code's dissociative-disorder diagnosis scope, suggests that either the code is incorrectly applied to these opportunities or this code sees minimal relevant recent state and local activity aligned with its actual scope.