UNSPSC 85253500: Diagnoses of carcinoma in situ of cervix uteri

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a diagnosis of Carcinoma In Situ of Cervix Uteri. Carcinoma In Situ of Cervix Uteri is listed In The World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or Icd-10 as a Three Digit Category under code A00.

Icd-10 Also Has The Following Carcinoma In Situ of Cervix Uteri Children in its Four-Character Category: D06.0 or Carcinoma In Situ: Endocervix; D06.1 or Carcinoma In Situ: Exocervix; D06.7 or Carcinoma In Situ: Other Parts of Cervix; D06.9 or Carcinoma In Situ: Cervix, Unspecified. CARCINOMA in SITU of CERVIX UTERI is listed in the Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services International Classification Of Diseases Clinical Modification (Tenth Revision) (Icd-10-CM) as a Three Digit Category under code D06.

UNSPSC 85253500 Diagnoses of carcinoma in situ of cervix uteri is a Class code that shows little relevant recent activity aligned with its nominal scope. The three most recent state and local opportunities tagged to this code are a diagnostic imaging PACS system procurement by San Mateo Medical Center, a special education contracted services RFP by Birdville Independent School District in Texas, and a temporary health professional staffing services qualification vehicle by the County of Santa Clara Health System. None of these solicitations involve cervical carcinoma screening, diagnosis, or related pathology services; the code appears to have been misapplied to healthcare IT and staffing procurement that falls outside the code's intended clinical scope.

The issuing bodies span a county hospital system, a school district, and a county health system across three different states. Because the recent opportunities do not reflect the code's actual clinical or diagnostic focus, the geographic distribution and issuing-body pattern do not signal meaningful procurement demand under this code. Prospective vendors should verify coding accuracy during Q&A cycles before investing in proposal development, as the mismatch between code classification and solicited services suggests either data-entry error or a coding convention at odds with standard UNSPSC taxonomy. State and local procurement offices vary in coding discipline; this code warrants clarification directly from the issuing body before pursuing opportunities tagged to it.