UNSPSC 82112017: In person dinka interpretation service

Dinka (Sudan)language interpretation services

UNSPSC 82112017 In person dinka interpretation service (Commodity) does not align with the recent state and local procurement activity posted under this code. The source shows no solicitations for Dinka language interpretation services—in-person or otherwise. Instead, the opportunities tagged to this code span a broad range of language access services, predominantly English-language interpretation for deaf and hard-of-hearing populations, multilingual interpretation and translation across dozens of language pairs (Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese, Arabic, ASL, and others), and specialized healthcare and educational interpreting. The mismatch between the code name and the actual buying activity suggests either a cataloging error in the state and local procurement system or a code that is rarely used as intended.

School districts, county government, state departments, and specialized public agencies (health plans, transit authorities, medical centers) are the primary issuing bodies. Hillsborough County Public Schools in Florida appears twice with large-scale speech-language pathology staffing (approximately 100 SLP vacancies estimated at $11.6 million annually) and sign language interpreting for deaf and hard-of-hearing students (estimated $950,000 annually). Recent representative opportunities include Hillsborough County Public Schools' RFP 26041-DST for interpreting services for deaf or hard-of-hearing students and staff with an April 15, 2026 due date; Marion County, Oregon's RFP SC2510200018038 for interpreter and translation services with a November 12, 2026 due date; Montgomery County, Pennsylvania's RFP 26-01 for comprehensive 24/7 language access services across over 200 languages due May 22, 2026; and the Oregon Department of Human Services and Oregon Health Authority's RFA S-10000-00017152 for telephonic interpretation available 24/7/365 with a September 28, 2026 due date. Activity concentrates in Florida, Oregon, Texas, and Pennsylvania; the long tail includes solicitations from Missouri, Georgia, Illinois, California, Washington, and the District of Columbia. The code's nominal scope—Dinka in-person interpretation—bears no relation to current procurement demand and warrants clarification with issuing bodies before pursuing.