UNSPSC 82112009: In person bosnian interpretation service

Bosnian (Serbo Croation) language services

UNSPSC 82112009 In person bosnian interpretation service is a Commodity code that shows minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal scope. The code's name specifies a single language pair—Bosnian interpretation delivered in person—yet state and local jurisdictions soliciting under this code are actually procuring broad-spectrum language access services spanning dozens of languages, modalities (in-person, telephonic, video remote, document translation), and service contexts (education, healthcare, courts, human services, transit). Recent opportunities name Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean, Mandarin Chinese, Arabic, ASL, and many others, with only rare mentions of Bosnian or any Balkan language. The mismatch suggests either systematic miscoding at the issuing-body level or that UNSPSC 82112009 serves as a catchall for interpretation services when issuers lack a more specific commodity classification. The issuing-body mix spans state agencies (Oregon Department of Human Services, Oregon Health Authority, Mississippi State Department of Health, Illinois Central Management Services), counties (Jackson County Missouri, Marion County Oregon, Collin County Texas, Montgomery County Pennsylvania, San Mateo County California), independent school districts (Hillsborough County Public Schools Florida, Hays Consolidated ISD Texas, Katy ISD Texas, Columbia County School District Georgia, Tacoma Public Schools Washington, Griffin-Spalding County School System Georgia), cities (City of DeBary Florida), transit authorities (Orange County Transportation Authority), healthcare providers (Inland Empire Health Plan, San Mateo Medical Center, CareOregon), and higher education (Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center). School districts emerge as repeat buyers, with Hillsborough County Public Schools, Katy ISD, and others posting multiple solicitations for speech-language pathology, educational interpreting, and deaf/hard-of-hearing support services.

Geographic spread encompasses Florida (Hillsborough County, DeBary), Texas (Katy ISD, Collin County, TTUHSC), Oregon (Marion County, Oregon Department of Human Services, Oregon Housing and Community Services, CareOregon), Missouri (Jackson County), Georgia (Griffin-Spalding County, Columbia County), Pennsylvania (Montgomery County), California (San Mateo County, IEHP), Washington DC (OSSE), Mississippi (State Department of Health), and Illinois (state procurement). Florida and Texas show the heaviest recent activity. Representative solicitations include Hillsborough County Public Schools' RFP 26041-DST (due April 15, 2026) for interpreting services for deaf and hard-of-hearing students district-wide, estimated annual budget $950,000, seeking sign language interpreting with EIPA 3.5 or RID certification; Montgomery County Pennsylvania's RFP 26-01 (due May 22, 2026) for language access services spanning 200+ languages, over-the-phone interpretation, video remote interpretation, and in-person interpreting with no guaranteed minimum volume; and Marion County Oregon's RFP (due November 12, 2026) for interpreter and translation services supporting limited English proficiency and deaf/hard-of-hearing individuals accessing county services. Oregon Department of Human Services jointly with Oregon Health Authority posted RFA S-10000-00017152 (due September 28, 2026) for statewide telephonic interpretation available 24/7/365 across 60+ languages, requiring minimum three years' experience and 100,000 monthly interpretation minutes. Hillsborough County Public Schools also solicited RFP 24127-RFP-DST (due March 23, 2026) for speech-language pathologists and assistants addressing 100 SLP vacancies and 2 SLPA vacancies, with annual budget approximately $11.6 million. Most recent notices reflect standing demand for on-demand and pre-scheduled interpretation, strong preference for certified or licensed interpreters, 24/7 availability requirements, and multi-language capability at scale; many issuers explicitly prohibit or discourage offshore subcontracting.