UNSPSC 81101711: Electronic component manufacturing service

Manufacturing service specifically for electronic components

UNSPSC 81101711 Electronic component manufacturing service is a Commodity code that, based on recent state and local procurement activity, does not align with the work actually being solicited under it. The recent opportunities posted against this code cover electrical services, facility maintenance, special-events electrical contracting, hazardous-materials consulting, law-enforcement equipment procurement, water-reclamation electrical replacement, and school district computer-device acquisition and configuration—none of which constitute electronic component manufacturing or component-level manufacturing services. The most substantive recent posting, Hillsborough County Public Schools' solicitation 26376RFQDST for computer devices and related services (RFP due October 7, 2026, amended to October 20, 2026 per the notice), involves device provisioning, configuration, imaging, and deployment services for approximately 13,000 teacher and student computing devices annually across a $34 million three-year contract, but this work is device assembly support and lifecycle management rather than component manufacturing. The remaining opportunities—on-call electrical services at DeKalb County and Atlanta Public Schools, commercial trades and repair work at the City of Lubbock, electrical-fixture supply at Columbus Consolidated Government, low-voltage IT/AV installations at City Colleges of Chicago, and special-events electrical contracting at the City of Richardson—fall outside the manufacturing taxonomy entirely.

The code shows no meaningful recent state and local procurement activity in electronic component manufacturing. Issuing bodies in the recent block span school districts, county governments, cities, and consolidated government offices across Georgia, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and Washington, but their needs are in service contracting and device procurement, not component fabrication or assembly. Geographic activity appears across the Southeast (Georgia, Florida), South-Central (Texas), Midwest (Illinois), and Pacific Northwest (Washington), but this distribution reflects opportunistic code misclassification rather than genuine market segmentation. Vendors evaluating this code should expect limited pursuit opportunity unless source material indicates a deliberate shift in how states and localities categorize electronics-related work; current posting patterns suggest the code is not actively used for its intended scope in state and local procurement.